Need a study break? Stop by Cook Library and play some board games, video games, and card games.
Albert S. Cook Library at Towson University and hundreds of libraries across the country will join the American Library Association (ALA), Nordic Game Day, and Australian Library and In-formation Association (ALIA) in celebrating the popularity and educational, recreational, and social value of video and board games for International Games Day @ your library on Saturday, November 21, 2015.
For more information on International Games Day please visit: http://www.ilovelibraries.org/article/international-games-day-2015.
If you answered yes to both of these questions, you should nominate the top paper from each of your sections for Cook Library’s new Towson Seminar Information Literacy Award.
What is the award?
Albert S. Cook Library wishes to recognize emerging research and scholarship with an award for Towson Seminar students.
Instructors may nominate one outstanding paper from each section of their Towson Seminar per fall and spring semester.
One student winner will be chosen each fall and spring semester. Instructors and students will receive recognition at an annual award ceremony, an individual award plaque, a $50 prize, and a nameplate on the commemorative plaque kept at Albert S. Cook Library. The winning entries will be placed in an institutional repository to be shared with students, faculty, and staff at Towson University.
What are the award criteria?
Winning papers will be evaluated based on the use of information literacy skills, as well as the quality of research, clarity of writing, and adherence to citation standards.
80% of the evaluation will be based on Information Literacy skills and award-winning papers will demonstrate many of the following qualities:
* Entry is accurate and sources are well-documented.
* Shows analysis and interpretation of a variety of sources (traditional and emerging).
* Places topic in a wider disciplinary context.
* Shows wide research, including authoritative sources from many different areas.
* Uses evaluative criteria to examine and select sources.
* Research is balanced, including varying opinions, source types, authors, and levels of scholarship.
20% of the evaluation will be based on the clarity and formatting of the student’s paper and award-winning papers will demonstrate the following qualities:
* Paper is original, clear, appropriate, organized, and well-presented.
* Text is clear, grammatical, and spelling is correct; entry is neatly prepared.
* Uses citations in the text and as a bibliography; follows correct citation style.
How does the nomination process work?
Faculty members can nominate a paper by doing the following:
- Completing this form
- E-mailing a pdf of the student’s paper to firstname.lastname@example.org.
We ask that faculty please submit their nominations before the last day of exams (Wednesday, December 16).
Upon receipt of a nomination, a librarian will then notify the student author and give him or her the chance to opt out of the contest.
Who should I contact if I have questions?
Please e-mail email@example.com with any questions you may have.
Apply online here: http://goo.gl/forms/QLFnxnyYjb (Application Deadline November, 22nd)
The library is seeking three adventurous students interested in gaining hands-on experience in academia through a yearlong, paid leadership program. The Albert S. Cook Library Leadership Institute for Students, (A-LIST), offers students experiential learning opportunities in leadership, research, research assistance, writing, teaching, and outreach. If you are passionate about promoting academic success, want to help enhance library visibility via innovative outreach, and are interested in teaching and helping students with research, please consider applying. All A-LIST students will receive extensive mentorship, leadership development, and job experience.
A-LIST students will be expected to commit 10 hours a week for two semesters (Spring 2016 and Fall 2016). After receiving in-depth training, students will represent the library, through peer research help and library outreach events. ALIST students will also have the opportunity to choose projects, working with various library departments to improve library services both internally and externally.
All students will be required to attend a minimum of six leadership workshops through the iLEAD program or other leadership opportunities on campus.
- Must have completed at least one semester at Towson University and have at least two semesters of enrollment remaining
- Must have a cumulative Towson GPA of 3.0 or higher
- Active member of the campus community with participation in one or more student groups, organizations, or clubs
- Creative and innovative thinker
- Outgoing personality with strong communication skills
- Excellent organizational skills
- Strong collaborative skills and enjoys working on a team
- Undergraduate student
- Previous leadership training, or civic engagement activity
- An interest in library science, education, marketing, or outreach
- Interest in and/or experience with graphic design, movie, or web design software
- Interest in and/or experience with interviewing, focus groups, or survey design
Pay: $10 an hour
Hours: 10 hours/week, flexible scheduling
Must commit for one full year.
Questions about the program can be sent to Carissa Tomlinson, Coordinator for Student Engagement & Outreach at firstname.lastname@example.org
Read all about what our A-LIST students are doing, the Latino Americans grant programming, and Cook Library’s involvement in Towson’s 150th in this edition of Cook Notes: http://cooklibrary.towson.edu/newsletters/CookNotes/2015-10/index.html
Dr. Elaine Pena, Associate Professor of American Studies at George Washington University, will begin the screening with a brief introduction to the segment, then the hour-long segment will be shown, and the event will conclude with a discussion about the themes brought forth in the segment.
Latino Americans: 500 Years of History has been made possible through a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the American Library Association.
- Linthicum Hall Room 224
- Wednesday, October 21, 2015 – 6:00pm to 8:00pm
Open Access Week, an international campaign promoting the adoption of open access (OA) scholarly communication methods, takes place this year October 19-25, 2015. As a strong supporter of the goals of the OA movement—namely, increasing the availability, usability, impact, and long-term preservation of high-quality scholarly research literature—Cook Library is using the occasion to share this Open Access infoPlaylist, created by Librarian Rick Davis, with the campus community.
What is open access?
The spread of digital communication technologies has enabled several different, sometimes complementary, “open” movements relevant to higher education and scholarly research, such as open education, open educational resources, open content, open science, open data, and open research. Open access, however, focuses primarily on the barrier-free digital publication or distribution of scholarly research, typically peer-reviewed research. Peter Suber, one of the foremost OA advocates, describes it as follows:
“Open-access (OA) literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.”
Why does this matter?
The current dominant scholarly communications model—in which authors rely on scholarly associations and/or commercial publishers to coordinate peer review, copyedit and format manuscripts, and then print and distribute the final version of their books and articles—has been with us for over 300 years. OA advocates claim that the model is not only antiquated but unsustainable, given the hyperinflationary price increases of academic journals and the long delays of peer review and traditional publication processes. Further, they argue that removing paywalls and copyright and licensing restrictions from scientific and scholarly research—research, by the way, that is often subsidized at least in part by taxpayer dollars—will allow others to expand and build upon it for the greater good of all.
OA literature is disseminated primarily via two vehicles, repositories (“green OA”) and journals (“gold OA”).
With “green OA” scholarly authors self-archive a copy of their final manuscripts in free, online institutional or subject-based repositories. OA repositories do not themselves conduct peer review, but they may contain articles which have gone through the peer review process.
With “gold OA” scholarly authors submit their articles for publication to designated OA journals. Gold OA journal production costs are covered by article publication fees, which might be paid by the authors themselves, by their home institutions, or by the funding agencies who financially support the authors’ research endeavors.
While the OA movement started in the sciences, specifically in computer science and in physics, it is by no means limited to scientific publishing. There are also thousands of content-rich green OA repositories and highly prestigious gold OA journals hosting scholarly research in the arts, humanities, and social sciences.
Open Access Overview, by Peter Suber
Open Access, by Peter Suber. A free, downloadable e-book from the MIT Press Essential Knowledge series. Additional download formats are available via the Internet Archive. Suber’s home page for the book includes updates and supplements, as well as links to reviews and additional resources.
Open Access Explained! A video from Piled Higher and Deeper (PHD Comics) – 8 min., 23 sec.
Formal Definitions of OA and OA Standards
Open access was formally defined in three public statements, released in 2002-2003. Collectively, these are sometimes referred to as the “BBB definition” of OA:
Budapest Open Access Initiative (February 2002)
Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (April 2003)
In September 2012 the Budapest OAI group also issued Ten Years on From the Budapest Open Access Initiative: Setting the Default to Open, a progress report with ten recommendations for further action.
The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) is a standard which facilitates interoperability among the thousands of digital repositories hosting OA research literature online. The OAI-PMH protocol ensures that these green OA works are discoverable via Internet search engines, in effect creating one unified global online repository of OA scholarship.
Federal Mandates and Proposed Legislation on OA
In 2009 the National Institutes of Health (NIH) implemented the first OA mandate by a major public funding agency in the U.S. The NIH Public Access Policy requires all researchers funded by the NIH to deposit an electronic version of their final, peer-reviewed manuscripts to the PubMed Central repository upon acceptance for publication. The submitted manuscripts may initially be embargoed, or suppressed from public view, but they must be made publicly available on PubMed Central no later than 12 months after the official date of publication.
In May 2012 a “We the People” petition was created on the White House website, requesting that the Obama Administration build upon the “highly successful” NIH Public Access Policy by implementing open access policies for all federal agencies that fund scientific research.
In February 2013, Dr. John Holdren, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, posted a response to the petition. Dr. Holdren announced that he had issued a memorandum directing federal agencies “with more than $100 million in research and development expenditures to develop plans to make the results of federally-funded research publicly available free of charge within 12 months after original publication.”
Dr. Holdren subsequently sent a letter to the House and Senate Appropriations Committees in March 2014, reporting on the progress that the federal agencies have made thus far in complying with his directive.
Several laws relating to OA have also been introduced in Congress over the last ten years, including laws supporting OA and laws seeking to repeal the NIH policy and block similar policies from going into effect at other federal agencies. See the following pages from the Harvard Open Access Project for more information:
OA Portals, Compendia, Feeds, etc.
These sites serve as portals to a wealth of additional information on OA:
Harvard Open Access Project. Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
Open Access Directory. A wiki hosted by the School of Library and Information Science at Simmons College
The Open Access Tracking Project. A feed of tagged blog and social media posts relating to OA
OA Author Tools and Services
The success of the OA movement ultimately depends upon a fundamental change in behavior by academic authors. In return for publication in prestigious journals, these authors have traditionally given their articles away for free to commercial or toll-access journals—even to the extent of transferring their copyright in their work. As a service to their profession, academics have also donated their free labor as journal editors and peer reviewers.
Fortunately, the tide is turning and academic authors are learning to retain their copyright—or at the very least the right to deposit their final articles in OA digital repositories, and to reuse the articles for their own teaching and scholarly purposes. They are also pressing the journals that they edit and review for to make their policies consistent with OA principles.
SPARC, the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, has led in the effort to assist academic authors with managing their publication rights. On the SPARC website, you’ll find a number of useful resources to support author rights, in particular the SPARC Author Addendum to academic publishing agreements.
Of course, there are reputable, not-so-reputable, and downright predatory players in OA scholarly publishing, just as there are in toll-access scholarly publishing. Beall’s List: Potential, Possible, or Probable Predatory Scholarly Open Access Publishers can help you determine the legitimacy of a particular OA journal or publisher.
Evaluating Open Access Journals, from Brian Cameron at the Ryerson University Library & Archives, also provides some useful criteria for academic authors.
HowOpenIsIt? Open Access Spectrum (OAS) Guide. Created by PLOS, SPARC, and OASPA, this short guide allows authors to better understand the various components of OA and helps them differentiate between “more open” and “less open” OA journals when they’re deciding where to publish their work.
SHERPA/RoMEO is a searchable database of publishers’ default policies regarding author self-archiving. If you’re not sure whether the publishing agreement you signed allows you to upload a copy of the final, peer-reviewed version of your paper on an openly accessible website or in an OA repository, search for the journal by title, ISSN, or publisher name in SHERPA/RoMEO. The RoMEO Statistics page also provides a breakdown of the number and types of publisher policies included in the database.
SHERPA/FACT allows researchers “to check if the journals in which they wish to publish their results comply with their funders’ requirements for open access to research.”
SHERPA/JULIET provides information on various funding agencies’ open access policies, for academic researchers who wish to check the requirements of any grants they have received.
A complement to SHERPA/JULIET, the Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies (ROARMAP) provides a searchable database “of open access mandates and policies adopted by universities, research institutions and research funders”
Finding OA Repositories, Journals, Books, etc.
OA Advocacy Organizations
OA Advocacy on YouTube
Benefits of Open Access. BioMed Central – 3 min., 58 sec.
Open Access: Democratising Knowledge. JISC – 7 min., 15 sec.
How Open Access Empowered a 16-Year Old to Make Cancer Breakthrough. The Right to Research Coalition – 3 min., 59 sec.
Elizabeth Marincola: Advance Science with Open Access Publishing. TEDMED – 13 min., 56 sec.
Research Without Borders: Radical Open Access in the Humanities. Center for Digital Research and Scholarship – 14 min., 9 sec.
“Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?” by John Bohannon
And last but not least…our very own green OA institutional repository!
MD-SOAR, the Maryland Shared Open Access Repository, launched earlier this year. This multi-institutional repository was established to host and preserve OA copies of scholarly works created at eleven different colleges and universities in Maryland, including Towson University. Watch the Cook Library website for further information about participating in the TU community site in MD-SOAR this spring!
To celebrate Open Access Week, Cook Library staff will be holding a open viewing of the webinar, “Faculty Perspectives on Publishing Open Access.”
Tuesday, October 20th
Cook Library Room 505D
Reports find that perceptions of OA publishing are changing for the better and as a result, many faculty members seek out OA publications for maximum access and impact. However, other researchers continue to avoid it, and those who are early in their careers still aren’t sure how to fit it in their publishing priorities. In this one-hour webinar, three faculty members will discuss why researchers do – or do not – publish in open access outlets and how they look to librarians for support in this process.
- Dr. Alan Daly, Chair and Professor of the Department of Education Studies at the University of California, San Diego, will discuss how open access publishing is the best option for the individual researcher and the research community as a whole.
- Dr. Bruce Herbert, Professor of Geology and Director of the Office of Scholarly Communications at Texas A&M University, will discuss why researchers at his institution avoid open access outlets for publishing research and why subscription-based journals remain the best option for many.
- Dr. Shannon Audley-Piotrowski, Assistant Professor of Educational Psychology at Smith College, will discuss publishing priorities for early-career researchers.
- David Ross, Executive Publisher of Open Access at SAGE, will moderate the panel and take Q&A from webinar attendees.